Squall
03-20-2003, 09:25 PM
Is the Internet good for the environment?
I can't remember what website I found this term paper on, or I'd post a link to it (I believe it was the website for a Big XII or SEC college), but I thought it was a very interesting term paper.
According to the author's research, the Internet was a VERY good thing as far as environmental protection was concerned. An untold amount of paper (and thus trees) have been saved due to E-Mail, news groups, message boards, and Web Rings. Putting databases on the Internet and entire encyclopedias on CD-ROM has virtually eliminated the printing of yearly sets of encyclopedias and reference books. (For example, in the U.T. Austin Science & Math Library, you won't find many journals or encyclopedia sets printed after 1995.)
And, he or she said, when waterproof, durable PADDS become cheap and reliable (you know, like the ones on 'Star Trek'?), then the magazine and newspaper will probably follow. In the future, everyone will have PADDS on them all the time -- just like everyone know always has a cell phone on them -- and in the future most magazines and newspapers will be delivered via CD-ROM or downloaded off the Web.
Does this mean that the printed word is dead? Of course not. It just means that the printed word won't be near as common in the future as it has been in the past.
Now, the author did note that the sales of printer paper increased by 50% between 1995 and 2000, but that most printer paper is easily recycled, and ends up being recycled due to the policies of office buildings, schools, and hospitals recycling their paper.
What do YOU think? I'm really interested in this issue, and would love to hear opinions! Personally I agree with the article, and look forward to the day when we all have our PADDS! :p
I can't remember what website I found this term paper on, or I'd post a link to it (I believe it was the website for a Big XII or SEC college), but I thought it was a very interesting term paper.
According to the author's research, the Internet was a VERY good thing as far as environmental protection was concerned. An untold amount of paper (and thus trees) have been saved due to E-Mail, news groups, message boards, and Web Rings. Putting databases on the Internet and entire encyclopedias on CD-ROM has virtually eliminated the printing of yearly sets of encyclopedias and reference books. (For example, in the U.T. Austin Science & Math Library, you won't find many journals or encyclopedia sets printed after 1995.)
And, he or she said, when waterproof, durable PADDS become cheap and reliable (you know, like the ones on 'Star Trek'?), then the magazine and newspaper will probably follow. In the future, everyone will have PADDS on them all the time -- just like everyone know always has a cell phone on them -- and in the future most magazines and newspapers will be delivered via CD-ROM or downloaded off the Web.
Does this mean that the printed word is dead? Of course not. It just means that the printed word won't be near as common in the future as it has been in the past.
Now, the author did note that the sales of printer paper increased by 50% between 1995 and 2000, but that most printer paper is easily recycled, and ends up being recycled due to the policies of office buildings, schools, and hospitals recycling their paper.
What do YOU think? I'm really interested in this issue, and would love to hear opinions! Personally I agree with the article, and look forward to the day when we all have our PADDS! :p