PDA

View Full Version : What you are about to read may disturb some people.


Noah The Rex
04-19-2009, 02:54 PM
http://lifestyle.msn.com/relationships/articlematch.aspx?cp-documentid=18728044&gt1=32023

What you are about to read may disturb some people.


It is obvious that women are the superior sex and have the divine right to rule over men unequivocally and without question or doubt. Men should be the unrestricted property of the female population. This is correct and cannot be argued.

Ideally women should inherit the Earth’s (also known as home) land. Men would by no means be in power being subordinate to women. However men would not be abused as long as they respect and obey their Mistresses. Men would have to be domesticated and servile under female authority.

Women are naturally better at making decisions being that they are more analytical in their thought process compared to men who only react on impulse. It is this reason that the only way to bring women to power in this unfortunate male dominated world is to somehow get the majority of the Earth’s population to believe and accept that males as a whole and in general are subhuman and unfit to rule. This would eventually solve many of our problems, as the disarray that society is in is mainly the fault of men.

Years ago, most likely somewhere between 1994 and 1995, atop the car dealership stood a mighty orange stegosaurus display much like the cow at Mel’s. At some point in time the display was taken down much to the dismay of children everywhere. To remedy this problem the display must be located and successfully reinstated. Despite the fact that most of the stegosaurs’ daily deeds would have one fined, arrested, incarcerated, maybe even deported.


From the article;

Way back when, only the alpha caveman who brought back some brontosaurus ribs could expect any action that evening. The cave women roasted the ribs and raised the cave babies; the cave guys spent their days chasing the mighty beasts."
...they're still looking for the guy who brings home the stegosaurus chops.


Now, am I the only person who picked up on this problem?

"Yes, Noah. What seems to be the problem?" you ask.

Well, I shall explain. Following the timescale given by scientific evidence, humankind came A LONG FREAKIN' TIME after the dinosaurs were extinct. This makes the entire point of this little paragraph non-effective. 65 million years ago, humans never even existed, not even a trace of humans.

MonkeyFunk
04-19-2009, 03:03 PM
I looked at the statements in context...

"It might seem like a brave new world," a male friend tells me. "But in fact, we are controlled by impulses and cravings as old as sex itself. Way back when, only the alpha caveman who brought back some brontosaurus ribs could expect any action that evening. The cave women roasted the ribs and raised the cave babies; the cave guys spent their days chasing the mighty beasts."

Well, yes, but isn't this the 21st century?

"To you, maybe," he says. "But to women, they're still looking for the guy who brings home the stegosaurus chops."

I have to admit, even ignoring the more insane points of my friend's dinosaur-centric theory of courting, there is something simple and comforting to the Money-Man style of dating.So the author's just quoting a tongue-in-cheek comment made by his friend, which wasn't meant to be taken too literally.

I can't find the quoted text about female superiority and stegosaurus displays in the article. Where did you get it?

TripleS
04-19-2009, 03:04 PM
Women are naturally better at making decisions being that they are more analytical in their thought process compared to men who only react on impulse. It is this reason that the only way to bring women to power in this unfortunate male dominated world is to somehow get the majority of the Earth’s population to believe and accept that males as a whole and in general are subhuman and unfit to rule.
As a chick myself, I find that is absolute bull. I hate that whole 'one sex is better than the other' argument, because both sexes have their flaws. Sure, men are assumed to be impulsive and lazy, but women can also be very insecure and let emotions get the best of them. So by a technicality, to say that women really make the better choices isn't entirely true. I won't lie, I've let my moodiness get the best of me and I ended up making the wrong choices, as I have seen many girls do before.

Noah The Rex
04-19-2009, 03:54 PM
Look, I'm the dino-nerd here. I know for a fact that humans and dinosaurs did NOT co-exist. Come on, that's like, basic dino fact 101! Last summer my parents sent me to space camp instead of dino camp, worst summer of my life.

Dr.Pepper
04-19-2009, 04:09 PM
I don't think one sex is better than the other. Also, many I think that many prehistoric tribes were female-dominated.

Sidewinder1984
04-19-2009, 04:19 PM
http://lifestyle.msn.com/relationshi...8044&gt1=32023 (http://lifestyle.msn.com/relationships/articlematch.aspx?cp-documentid=18728044&gt1=32023)

What you are about to read may disturb some people.

Quote:
It is obvious that women are the superior sex and have the divine right to rule over men unequivocally and without question or doubt. Men should be the unrestricted property of the female population. This is correct and cannot be argued.

Ideally women should inherit the Earth’s (also known as home) land. Men would by no means be in power being subordinate to women. However men would not be abused as long as they respect and obey their Mistresses. Men would have to be domesticated and servile under female authority.

Women are naturally better at making decisions being that they are more analytical in their thought process compared to men who only react on impulse. It is this reason that the only way to bring women to power in this unfortunate male dominated world is to somehow get the majority of the Earth’s population to believe and accept that males as a whole and in general are subhuman and unfit to rule. This would eventually solve many of our problems, as the disarray that society is in is mainly the fault of men.

Years ago, most likely somewhere between 1994 and 1995, atop the car dealership stood a mighty orange stegosaurus display much like the cow at Mel’s. At some point in time the display was taken down much to the dismay of children everywhere. To remedy this problem the display must be located and successfully reinstated. Despite the fact that most of the stegosaurs’ daily deeds would have one fined, arrested, incarcerated, maybe even deported.

From the article;

Quote:
Way back when, only the alpha caveman who brought back some brontosaurus ribs could expect any action that evening. The cave women roasted the ribs and raised the cave babies; the cave guys spent their days chasing the mighty beasts."
Quote:
...they're still looking for the guy who brings home the stegosaurus chops.

Now, am I the only person who picked up on this problem?

"Yes, Noah. What seems to be the problem?" you ask.

Well, I shall explain. Following the timescale given by scientific evidence, humankind came A LONG FREAKIN' TIME after the dinosaurs were extinct. This makes the entire point of this little paragraph non-effective. 65 million years ago, humans never even existed, not even a trace of humans. (http://lifestyle.msn.com/relationships/articlematch.aspx?cp-documentid=18728044&gt1=32023)



You shot who in the what now?

Mesousa
04-19-2009, 05:18 PM
...

WHAT? :confused:

purplehairedwonder
04-19-2009, 05:31 PM
Um yeah, this isn't making a whole lot of sense.

Thread closed.