View Full Version : Animated Bliss posts review on Aqua Teen Hunger Force DVD
Jimmy Kustes
01-24-2004, 11:20 AM
Click here:
http://www.animatedbliss.com/news.asp?TID=337
bassist
01-24-2004, 11:35 AM
A very good review of ATHF is always something good. Though I'm not sure how many people will actually stumble across this review without having either already purchased the set or already decided to, those that do find it who haven't bought ATHF yet will certainly be lured towards the right decision.
A few downsides is that the review is obviously skewed in favor of the Aqua Teens. "The cartoon went on to beecome one of the greatest shows of all time." That line alone shows the perspective, and though I agree, it hurts the believe ability of the author. The spelling mistake, the only one I found, also hurts credibility.
Still, a solid review with excellent coverage of the Extras, except for the fact that the difference between the two versions of Rabbot was not explained, and the easter eggs. Overall, I give this review a 7/10.
lostrune
01-24-2004, 03:00 PM
Still, a solid review with excellent coverage of the Extras, except for the fact that the difference between the two versions of Rabbot was not explained, and the easter eggs. Overall, I give this review a 7/10.
So... we're reviewing reviews now? :D
Jimmy Kustes
01-29-2004, 09:56 AM
Posted it on Planet42 as well. Have to spread the Hunger.
http://www.planet42.com/movies/reviews/template/aqua_teen_hunger_force.shtml
saladdays
01-29-2004, 10:40 AM
A few downsides is that the review is obviously skewed in favor of the Aqua Teens. "The cartoon went on to beecome one of the greatest shows of all time." That line alone shows the perspective, and though I agree, it hurts the believe ability of the author. The spelling mistake, the only one I found, also hurts credibility.
I dunno. If one spelling mistake really hurts credibility that much, then I don't think anyone would believe anything in practically every newspaper across the country.
bassist
01-29-2004, 04:18 PM
If one spelling mistake really hurts credibility that much, then I don't think anyone would believe anything in practically every newspaper across the country.Well, seeing as how the internet is full of good and accurate information, the papers must be right all the time, so obviously I'd have to believe them if they had the good sense to names themselves respectable names like the New York Times (with a writer who fabricated stories) or the Washington Post (which accepted donations from politicians to avoid publishing incriminating stories). The press is supposed to police the state, but who polices the press?
saladdays
01-30-2004, 11:21 AM
Well, seeing as how the internet is full of good and accurate information, the papers must be right all the time, so obviously I'd have to believe them if they had the good sense to names themselves respectable names like the New York Times (with a writer who fabricated stories) or the Washington Post (which accepted donations from politicians to avoid publishing incriminating stories). The press is supposed to police the state, but who polices the press?
Good question, but I wasn't referring to anything like this. Newpapers were just the best example I could think of at the time.
vBulletin® v3.8.2, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.